<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Artema's Universe &#187; Ad Rem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://universe1.org/category/ad-rem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://universe1.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Einstein Archives Online</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/einstein-archives-online/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/einstein-archives-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2003 04:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/einstein-archives-online/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1891 Albert Einstein began his studies on mathematics in Munich.  His family moved to Milan, but he could not be torn away from his studies.  He failed once for an entrance examination to Eidgen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/einstein-archives-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hydrogenated oils as bad as cholesterol</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/hydrogenated-oils-as-bad-as-cholesterol/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/hydrogenated-oils-as-bad-as-cholesterol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2003 03:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/hydrogenated-oils-as-bad-as-cholesterol/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve read lately there is a menace as bad as cholesterol in clogging your arteries.  They&#8217;re known as trans fats, and the FDA is soon requiring warning labels specific to them.  You can read about this fully at <a href="http://bantransfats.com/">bantransfats</a>.  I didn&#8217;t realize until recently that Oreos are made filled with these trans fats.  Supposedly this makes them one of the worst foods for you, as such hydrogenated oils can cause serious health problems with excessive intake.  The site suggests a ban on the cookie, and while I love Oreos, I&#8217;m all for it.  Below are a few bits of information from their site.</p>
<p><font class="quote">&#8220;The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has recently taken the position that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/hydrogenated-oils-as-bad-as-cholesterol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mercury passing in front of the sun</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/mercury-passing-in-front-of-the-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/mercury-passing-in-front-of-the-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2003 22:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/mercury-passing-in-front-of-the-sun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap030508.html">Today&#8217;s APOD</a> is a great example of how various objects in the solar system scale to one another.  Most everyone has seen the elementary school planetary models of foam balls.  To get such a model to scale would not be possible, so you must of course suspend your disbelief.  How large is our star really?  <a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap030508.html">This</a> shows Mercury passing in front of the sun.  It may be hard to spot Mercury, it is the tiny dot.  Mercury is that small in comparison to the sun, even at a distance of almost 58 million kilometers.  Sunspots are another great way to determine that a star is unbelievably large.  <a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020801.html">Here you can see</a> a sunspot over 30 times the diameter of the earth and it appears as a spec on the surface of our local star.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/mercury-passing-in-front-of-the-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mysteries and miracles of Kevlar</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/mysteries-and-miracles-of-kevlar/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/mysteries-and-miracles-of-kevlar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2003 08:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/mysteries-and-miracles-of-kevlar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A British Marine Commando, Eric Walderman, was shot in the head four times and all bullets were halted by his Kevlar helmet.  He was serving in Iraq and was shot at Umm Qasr.  He&#8217;s uninjured and still serving with the Alpha Company.</p>
<p><em><strong>The facts on Kevlar:</strong></p>
<li>Kevlar was developed and manufactured by US firm DuPont in the mid-1960s.</li>
<li>Kevlar is a long chain-like molecule known as a polymer, which consists of repeating units called monomers.</li>
<li>Helmets made of Kevlar are 25%-40% more resistant to projectiles than their steel predecessors of equal weight.</li>
<li>A Kevlar fiber is an array of molecules oriented parallel to each other like a package of uncooked spaghetti. This orderly, untangled arrangement of molecules is described as a crystalline structure. Crystallinity is obtained by a manufacturing process known as spinning, which involves extruding the molten polymer solution through small holes. The crystallinity of the Kevlar polymer strands contributes significantly to Kevlar&#8217;s unique strength and rigidity.</li>
<li>Underwater, Kevlar is 20 times stronger than steel.</li>
<li>Kevlar is a polyaromatic amide. That is, it contains aromatic and amide groups. Other polymers with a high breaking strength often contain one or both of these molecular groups.</li>
<li>The individual polymer strands of Kevlar are held together by hydrogen bonds that form between the polar amide groups on adjacent chains.</li>
<li>The aromatic components of Kevlar polymers have a radial (spoke-like) orientation, which gives a high degree of symmetry and regularity to the internal structure of the fibers. This crystalline-like regularity is the largest contributing factor in the strength of Kevlar. Only with bright synchrotron radiation could the secret strength of Kevlar be revealed.</li>
<li>Kevlar military helmets replaced the &#8220;steel pot&#8221; helmet in the late 1970s.</li>
<li>Kevlar body vests and helmets have saved the lives of more than 2,700 police and prison officers in the US alone, its manufacturers claim - and they have their own Kevlar Survivors Club.</li>
<li>Stressed fiber optics can greatly degrade performance.  Braided Kevlar is often used to surround fiber optics to ensure the tensile strength of the cable.</li>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/mysteries-and-miracles-of-kevlar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Light ~ young and old</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/light-young-and-old/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/light-young-and-old/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 03:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/light-young-and-old/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In past articles I&#8217;ve discussed the progression of fusion as a star gets larger, and directed you to a wonderful site which visually explains <a href="http://zebu.uoregon.edu/textbook/energygen.html">hydrogen to helium fusion</a>.  To go into more detail we&#8217;ll discuss the speed of light, and the distances between objects on galactic scale.  This will open up for future discussion on distances between galaxies and red shift.</p>
<p>At its speed, 100% of light&#8217;s energy is being put into the first, second and third dimensions.  The fourth dimension, time, has no remaining energy, and so the actual photon of light does not pass through time, only space.  To the outside observer light travels at 299,792,458 meters (186,000 miles) per second.</p>
<p>The measurement of a light-year is for distance.  To be even more specific it is the distance light travels in a year.  That is 229,792,458 meters by 31,536,000 seconds, or over 7 quadrillion meters.  It takes light approximately 8 seconds to reach us once it leaves the sun.  The distance from the sun to the earth is 149,600,000 kilometers average, 1 AU, or 8 light-seconds.  The distance from the sun to Pluto is 5,913,520,000 kilometers average, 39.5 AU, or 5 light-minutes.  Our nearest star is 4.3 light-years away.  Our galaxy is approximately 100,000 light-years in diameter.  Our nearest large galaxy, Andromeda (M31), is 2.9 million light-years away.  I&#8217;ll talk about its double nucleus at another time.</p>
<p>Light has to travel a long way in this Universe.  Sometimes it even loses the battle.  At the extreme distances between galaxies the expansion of the universe is evident.  As the actual fabric of space is accelerating outwards it is actually possible for the rate to exceed light&#8217;s capability to overcome it.  There are many galaxies receding at well over the speed of light.  Once a galaxy reaches this point, in relation to us, we can no longer receive updates on what is happening in said galaxy.  It will appear frozen in time before it fades from view.</p>
<p>To come back to our solar system, and specifically the structure of the sun, I&#8217;ll discuss the rate at which light can escape the sun.  In matter on earth you have lots of space involved.  There is a great distance between atoms in your body.  The great pressures involved in the core of a star compress the hydrogen to where the atoms bump into each other rapidly and fuse into helium.  At this density exiting photons easily hit hydrogen nuclei, which absorb the photon, and send it back out in a completely random direction.  This &#8220;random walk&#8221; can easily make the progression out of the star take 40,000 years.  While the light you see may be that old, it still takes only 8 minutes to reach us, so we still see the sun as it was 8 minutes ago.  With all this going on the photon hasn&#8217;t aged at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/light-young-and-old/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where do you stand scientifically?</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/where-do-you-stand-scientifically/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/where-do-you-stand-scientifically/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 11:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/where-do-you-stand-scientifically/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve mentioned before in the article  <a href="http://universe1.org/athenaeum/000030.html">U.S. belief in pseudoscience is up</a> that 70% of American adults do not understand the scientific process.  If you&#8217;re interested in testing where you stand, for the purpose of improving yourself, check out these <a href="http://www.1001-periodic-table-quiz-questions.com/">periodic table quizes</a>.</p>
<p>I just went through one of the top level quizes, and I didn&#8217;t recognize a great deal of the names involved.  This isn&#8217;t to say that you don&#8217;t understand the theories themselves.  I plan to spend the next few weeks taking these and studying my results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/where-do-you-stand-scientifically/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Water is lighter than air</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/water-is-lighter-than-air/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/water-is-lighter-than-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2003 07:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/water-is-lighter-than-air/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is lighter than air?  Most would assume not much.  There is a newly discovered sponge-like material that fits this category, but I may discuss that at another time.  Water is actually lighter than air.  This can be directly observed by viewing clouds.  Separated molecules of water float on a layer of relatively dense air.</p>
<p>To explain why, when water is so light, does it sit below the atmosphere in the oceans you have to understand the extreme density of water.  Water has a much stronger attractive force than do most gaseous molecules.  The volume of 1 kilogram of water is much smaller than is 1 kilogram of, say, Nitrogen.  However once separated you will find the lighter molecules begin to evaporate and are forced upwards by the greater weight of the surrounding air.</p>
<p>In clouds you have water molecules loosely moving through the atmosphere.  As the area which makes up the cloud becomes denser with water it begins to coalesce into rain.  Again, as dense water weighs more, it begins its downward fall.</p>
<p>There is a very fascinating story on the rain and heat cycles of the earth I will discuss soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/water-is-lighter-than-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Galactic scale distance &#038; perspective</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/galactic-scale-distance-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/galactic-scale-distance-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 07:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/galactic-scale-distance-perspective/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We see pictures of beautiful and colorful nebula provided by the world&#8217;s best telescopes.  Orion&#8217;s outline can be traced with the human eye and a little creativity.  Far away galaxies show patterns of gravitational arms.  Most stars we can see are actually two, three, and even four.  Our perspective from earth is funny in that we often miss the details for the bigger picture.</p>
<p>Now it is not to say that the bigger picture is more or less important than the details.  It does offer us the ability to understand how large-scale physics works, which would be otherwise impossible.  It does however introduce problems for studying things nearby.</p>
<p>The gravitational arms of spiral galaxies are a trait we could only easily detect from a distance.  These massive arms are dense areas of a galaxy, rotating relatively slowly for an eternity.  From inside the same galaxy, it would take countless observations and calculations to determine whether or not you were inside of a gravitational arm.</p>
<p>If you saw Orion from behind, do you think it would look like the same man, and the same belt?  In actuality you wouldn&#8217;t be able to see half of the stars from behind.  Many of the stars composing Orion are very bright, and very far away.  The rest are progressively closer, and progressively dimmer.  From our position in our galaxy this results in us seeing each point on Orion as nearly the same luminosity.</p>
<p>Nebulas are vastly spread out gas particles which at a great distance form a recognizable structure.  The Gum Nebula is the closest supernova remnant to our sun.  It spans 40 degrees, and resides between 450 and 1500 light-years away.  It is so close we can barely see it, and we know almost nothing about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/galactic-scale-distance-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad hoc hypothesis &#038; selective thinking</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/ad-hoc-hypothesis-selective-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/ad-hoc-hypothesis-selective-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2003 03:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/ad-hoc-hypothesis-selective-thinking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know if you deceive yourself?  If you have strong beliefs, do you fight against opposing ideas without wavering?  Does your agenda blind you?  I highly reccomend to everyone of all ages to read the following articles in the <a href="http://skepdic.com/">Skeptic&#8217;s Dictionary</a>.</p>
<p><font class="quote">&#8220;Our capacity for self-deception has no known limits.&#8221; Michael Novak</font></p>
<p>See the Skeptical Dictionary&#8217;s entries on the following.  I have put them in order of my preference: <a href="http://skepdic.com/adhoc.html">ad hoc hypothesis</a>, <a href="http://skepdic.com/selectiv.html">selective thinking</a>, <a href="http://skepdic.com/posthoc.html">the post hoc fallacy</a>, <a href="http://skepdic.com/comreinf.html">communal reinforcement</a>, <a href="http://skepdic.com/testimon.html"> testimonials</a>, <a href="http://skepdic.com/selfdeception.html">self-deception</a>, <a href="http://skepdic.com/forer.html">subjective validation</a>, <a href="http://skepdic.com/confirmbias.html">confirmation bias</a>, <a href="http://skepdic.com/control.html">control study</a>, <a href="http://skepdic.com/occam.html">Ockham&#8217;s razor</a>, <a href="http://skepdic.com/placebo.html">the placebo effect</a>, <a href="http://skepdic.com/coldread.html">cold reading</a>, <a href="http://skepdic.com/wishfulthinking.html">wishful thinking</a>.</p>
<p>An <a href="http://skepdic.com/adhoc.html">ad hoc hypothesis</a> is one created to explain away facts that seem to refute one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/ad-hoc-hypothesis-selective-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. belief in pseudoscience is up</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/us-belief-in-pseudoscience-is-up/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/us-belief-in-pseudoscience-is-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2003 03:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/us-belief-in-pseudoscience-is-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this Space.com <a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/generalscience/us_science_020501.html">article</a> on poor scientific literacy in the United States.  It is an older article, but my blog is relatively new.  &#8220;<em>The study found that science literacy has improved only slightly since the previous survey and that 70 percent of American adults do not understand the scientific process.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>I find these results truly sad.  I wish all people would be as enthused as am I by the sciences.  The education system in this country is poor.  We don&#8217;t hire teachers based on their scientific beliefs as we should.  Can you imagine a science teacher who believes in creationism?  A co-worker of mine has told me his science teacher once laughed at him when he said he thought evolution was more likely.  There are still states in this nation which on are the edge of teaching creationism in schools!  We have so many answers in front of our faces, yet we ignore them.  I fear the future will see the 20th and 21st centuries as a naive and cult-driven time.</p>
<p><span id="more-17"></span><br />
<strong>- Addition as of 05/08/2003 -</strong><br />
To clarify one issue, as this seemed to have raised the hackles on some of you, and gotten us off-topic.  The form of Creationism which I am calling unfit for education is the fundamental definition of creationism.  Creationism in terms of the earth being 5 thousand years old, and being created in 168 hours.  Merriam-Webster describes it as &#8220;<em><a href="http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?creationism">a doctrine or theory holding that matter, the various forms of life, and the world were created by God out of nothing and usually in the way described in Genesis</a></em>.&#8221;  .  If you believe that God has created everything through scientific means such as evolution, then your beliefs are not fundamental creationism, and I am not bashing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/us-belief-in-pseudoscience-is-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gravity, acceleration, speed and time</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/gravity-acceleration-speed-and-time/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/gravity-acceleration-speed-and-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2003 03:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/gravity-acceleration-speed-and-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is to help explain my below article on my hypothesis on gravity.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gravity was &#8220;discovered&#8221; by Sir Isaac Newton.  He observed that an apple goes from a position of rest on a limb, and accelerates during its fall.  From that he gathered that a force must be accelerating it.  He used the works of Tycho Brahe and Johannes Kepler and derived the basis for the modern formula on gravity.</p>
<p>Time is very interesting.  It appears time is affected by motion.  To explain this better I will use an example from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0375708111/compootercom"> The Elegant Universe</a> by Brian Greene.  Imagine you are traveling between two lines, one kilometer apart, and it takes 1 minute to reach the other side.  Now, while still going in a straight line, start by facing left slightly, and it will take about 1 minute 5 seconds.  You&#8217;ve gone from traveling in one dimension to two dimensions.  There is a certain amount of energy distributed between the 4 dimensions, and when you put energy in one of the dimensions, it takes it away from the others.  So as you travel in both the first and second dimensions, you&#8217;re taking energy away from the 4th dimension: time.  Now imagine you&#8217;re traveling down hill slightly.  The distance is still 1 kilometer as the bird flies, but driving distance will be greater as you&#8217;re still going to the left and now downhill as well.  You end up taking 1 minute 20 seconds if going the same speed as before.  You were traveling through all 3 dimensions this time, and it took even more energy from the 4th dimension, thus taking more time.</p>
<p>Incase you didn&#8217;t know, light is frozen in time.  Photons are traveling at maximum speed, and all the energy that can be spread between the 4 dimensions are being put into the first 3, leaving none left for the 4th dimension.  It is actually possible to do minor time travel in our solar system.  It is not uncommon for a long space mission&#8217;s clock to be off a fraction of a second on its return to earth.  Traveling away from the earth&#8217;s motion can literally make you lose time.</p>
<p>Speed and acceleration appear to be simple concepts.  They are very rudimentary on earth.  You go from a resting position to one in motion, and the change in speed is called acceleration.  Once you stop accelerating, or changing your speed, you are at a constant, and no longer accelerating.  One note on semantics that I want to point out is about deceleration, it is actually negative acceleration, decelerate is a poor term.</p>
<p>This article is to help explain my below article on my hypothesis on gravity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/gravity-acceleration-speed-and-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My hypothesis on gravity</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/my-hypothesis-on-gravity/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/my-hypothesis-on-gravity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2003 00:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/my-hypothesis-on-gravity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is my hypothesis on gravity.  Do not take all of this as fact.  I am deriving information from things I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/my-hypothesis-on-gravity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fundamental particles and interactions</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/fundamental-particles-and-interactions/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/fundamental-particles-and-interactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2003 06:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/fundamental-particles-and-interactions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So as to better understand what I say at times, as I can stray from layman&#8217;s terms, please view and learn the information on <a href="http://particleadventure.org/particleadventure/frameless/chart.html">this chart</a>.  It will sufficiently explain the standard model of fundamental particles and interactions.  This is very interesting, so please bear with it, and try to take in the concept of the interactions more so than the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/fundamental-particles-and-interactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Build a television capable media PC</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/build-a-television-capable-media-pc/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/build-a-television-capable-media-pc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2003 03:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/build-a-television-capable-media-pc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have half a terabyte of hard drive space for DivX and mpeg-4 videos.  I open a video file with a mouse movement and 3 clicks, minimize media player, and watch it on my TV with digital sound to my AV receiver.  I can use the computer at the same time without noticeable slowdown or having to limit my computer use in fear of skipping.  It is seamless.  I can pause, rewind, and watch the next episode immediately; anything I care to do it is at my fingertips.  I will explain fully how to achieve this.</p>
<p>First you must start with a reasonable home theatre system.  I recommend an AV receiver with digital input.  Next you need to buy the smallest and best looking computer case you can bear to see in your living room or in whatever room your TV happens to be.  Be careful when picking your case, as built in video will be unsatisfactory and, you need to have room for an AGP slot.  I personally use the <a href="http://www.antec.com/us/pro_en_lifeStyle.html" target="_blank">Antec</a> Aria.  There are some amazingly small cases out which are VCR, or even Gamecube sized.  A processor from AMD or Intel rated at 2000 or above is recommended.  512 megabytes of RAM is my minimum.</p>
<p>If you are going to build a high quality media machine you will need the <a href="http://www.matrox.com/" target="_blank">Matrox</a> G400 Dual Head.  The G450, G500, and G550 are similar cards, but the G400 is truly the best for the job.  If you cannot find a <a href="http://castle.pricewatch.com/search/searchmc.idq?cr=G400&#038;qc=%22G400%22*%20AND%20%40minorder=1+AND+%40ctd+37&#038;i=37&#038;ct=Computer&#038;c=Video%20Cards&#038;mi=N&#038;m=N&#038;ne=16403&#038;l=16357" target="_blank">G400 on Price Watch</a> the others I mentioned will work passably, but do not go for another brand such as ATI All-In-Wonder.  The much more expensive <a href="http://www.matrox.com/" target="_blank">Matrox</a> Parhelia isn&#8217;t necessary, but will work too.</p>
<p>If your AV receiver supports digital then I would get a motherboard with digital sound capability onboard.  Digital sound is always flawless, so you need not worry about cheap components creating noise.  If you have only analog audio, I recommend a sound card such as the SoundBlaster Audigy 2 or the Turtle Beach Santa Cruz.</p>
<p><span id="more-13"></span><br />
I recommend hard drives such as the Western Digital special edition.  This is available in 72 to 360 gigabyte versions as of this writing.  The thing that makes this drive special is the 8 megabytes of cache.  This buffer is four times greater than the old standard.  There are now 16 MB cache drives produced by Maxtor as well.</p>
<p>The other components are your personal preference.  I personally have a VGA extension cable running to a recliner, the monitor to the right.  I have a USB extension cable connecting a Logitech optical trackball which sits on my recliner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/build-a-television-capable-media-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Formation of metals and stars</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/formation-of-metals-and-stars/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/formation-of-metals-and-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2003 03:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/formation-of-metals-and-stars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If this continues the star will reach a point of energy output that exceeds its capacity.  If you have ever used a firecracker you should know what happens when energy output exceeds the packaging]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The universe started when a singularity of all matter expanded.  Superstrings attracted to each other and formed quarks.  Quarks coalesced and formed protons.  Protons and electrons formed neutrons.  Protons, neutrons, and electrons formed hydrogen.  Hydrogen clouds gathered and under its gravity formed massive bodies.  As the bodies grew to enormous size to internal pressure caused hydrogen nuclei at the core to bounce into other hydrogen increasing temperature tremendously.  At high enough pressure and temperature it begins to fuse into deuterium.  This releases high energy particles.  The galactic body now radiates.  As more hydrogen gathers and pressures and temperature increase dramatically hydrogen begins to fuse into helium, which releases a large number of higher energy protons and electrons.</p>
<p>There are now a few things that can happen.  The star can continue to gather hydrogen, either from accreting from a companion star, or attracting hydrogen clouds.  If this continues the star will reach a point of energy output that exceeds its capacity.  If you have ever used a firecracker you should know what happens when energy output exceeds the packaging</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/formation-of-metals-and-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barrycenter of a hollow sphere</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/barrycenter-of-a-hollow-sphere/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/barrycenter-of-a-hollow-sphere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/barrycenter-of-a-hollow-sphere/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is another of the many miracles of pi.  Complete equilibrium throughout the entire structure.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gravitational barrycenter is a fascinating thing.  It creates a point between to massive objects in which their joined revolution is centered.  The earth and our moon has one 1,100 kilometers beneath the earth&#8217;s surface.  Pluto and Charon have one situated between the planets.  If you were to have an imaginary hollow sphere made out of a very thick and massive material, and you were stuck inside, where do you think you would come to rest?  Would you fall to the center?  Would you fall to the edge?  As it turns out, the mass of the side to which you are closest has a pull identical to the far end of the sphere&#8217;s mass.  As it is farther away, its gravitational forces are lessened in perfect synchronicity.  This is another of the many miracles of pi.  Complete equilibrium throughout the entire structure.  You would feel weightless as the gravitational pull of all sides counteracts itself.</p>
<p><span id="more-11"></span><br />
<font class="quote">pi     3.<br />
1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128 4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196 4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091 4564856692 3460348610 4543266482 1339360726 0249141273 7245870066 0631558817 4881520920 9628292540 9171536436 7892590360 0113305305 4882046652 1384146951 9415116094 3305727036 5759591953 0921861173 8193261179 3105118548 0744623799 6274956735 1885752724 8912279381 8301194912 9833673362 4406566430 8602139494 6395224737 1907021798 6094370277 0539217176 2931767523 8467481846 7669405132 0005681271 4526356082 7785771342 7577896091 7363717872 1468440901 2249534301 4654958537 1050792279 6892589235 4201995611 2129021960 8640344181 5981362977 4771309960 5187072113 4999999837 2978049951 0597317328 1609631859 5024459455 3469083026 4252230825 3344685035 2619311881 7101000313 7838752886 5875332083 8142061717 7669147303 5982534904 2875546873 1159562863 8823537875 9375195778 1857780532 1712268066 1300192787 6611195909 2164201989 3809525720 1065485863 2788659361 5338182796 8230301952 0353018529 6899577362 2599413891 2497217752 8347913151 5574857242 4541506959 5082953311 6861727855 8890750983 8175463746 4939319255 0604009277 0167113900 9848824012 8583616035 6370766010 4710181942 9555961989 4676783744 9448255379 7747268471 0404753464 6208046684 2590694912 9331367702 8989152104 7521620569 6602405803 8150193511 2533824300 3558764024 7496473263 9141992726 0426992279 6782354781 6360093417 2164121992 4586315030 2861829745 5570674983 8505494588 5869269956 9092721079 7509302955 3211653449 8720275596 0236480665 4991198818 3479775356 6369807426 5425278625 5181841757 4672890977 7727938000 8164706001 6145249192 1732172147 7235014144 1973568548 1613611573 5255213347 5741849468 4385233239 0739414333 4547762416 8625189835 6948556209 9219222184 2725502542 5688767179 0494601653 4668049886 2723279178 6085784383 8279679766 8145410095 3883786360 9506800642 2512520511 7392984896 0841284886 2694560424 1965285022 2106611863 0674427862 2039194945 0471237137 8696095636 4371917287 4677646575 7396241389 0865832645 9958133904 7802759009 9465764078 9512694683 9835259570 9825822620 5224894077 2671947826 8482601476 9909026401 3639443745 5305068203 4962524517 4939965143 1429809190 6592509372 2169646151 5709858387 4105978859 5977297549 8930161753 9284681382 6868386894 2774155991 8559252459 5395943104 9972524680 8459872736 4469584865 3836736222 6260991246 0805124388 4390451244 1365497627 8079771569 1435997700 1296160894 4169486855 5848406353 4220722258 2848864815 8456028506 0168427394 5226746767 8895252138 5225499546 6672782398 6456596116 3548862305 7745649803 5593634568 1743241125 1507606947 9451096596 0940252288 7971089314 5669136867 2287489405 6010150330 8617928680 9208747609 1782493858 9009714909 6759852613 6554978189 3129784821 6829989487 2265880485 7564014270 4775551323 7964145152 3746234364 5428584447 9526586782 1051141354 7357395231 1342716610 2135969536 2314429524 8493718711 0145765403 5902799344 0374200731 0578539062 1983874478 0847848968 3321445713 8687519435 0643021845 3191048481 0053706146 8067491927 8191197939 9520614196 6342875444 0643745123 7181921799 9839101591 9561814675 1426912397 4894090718 6494231961 5679452080 9514655022 5231603881 9301420937 6213785595 6638937787 0830390697 9207734672 2182562599 6615014215 0306803844 7734549202 6054146659 2520149744 2850732518 6660021324 3408819071 0486331734 6496514539 0579626856 1005508106 6587969981 6357473638 4052571459 1028970641 4011097120 6280439039 7595156771 5770042033 7869936007 2305587631 7635942187 3125147120 5329281918 2618612586 7321579198 4148488291 6447060957 5270695722 0917567116 7229109816 9091528017 3506712748 5832228718 3520935396 5725121083 5791513698 8209144421 0067510334 6711031412 6711136990 8658516398 3150197016 5151168517 1437657618 3515565088 4909989859 9823873455 2833163550 7647918535 8932261854 8963213293 3089857064 2046752590 7091548141 6549859461 6371802709 8199430992 4488957571 2828905923 2332609729 9712084433 5732654893 8239119325 9746366730 5836041428 1388303203 8249037589 8524374417 0291327656 1809377344 4030707469 2112019130 2033038019 7621101100 4492932151 6084244485 9637669838 9522868478 3123552658 2131449576 8572624334 4189303968 6426243410 7732269780 2807318915 4411010446 8232527162 0105265227 2111660396 6655730925 4711055785 3763466820 6531098965 2691862056 4769312570 5863566201 8558100729 3606598764 8611791045 3348850346 1136576867 5324944166 8039626579 7877185560 8455296541 2665408530 6143444318 5867697514 5661406800 7002378776 5913440171 2749470420 5622305389 9456131407 1127000407 8547332699 3908145466 4645880797 2708266830 6343285878 5698305235 8089330657 5740679545 7163775254 2021149557 6158140025 0126228594 1302164715 5097925923 0990796547 3761255176 5675135751 7829666454 7791745011 2996148903 0463994713 2962107340 4375189573 5961458901 9389713111 7904297828 5647503203 1986915140 2870808599 0480109412 1472213179 4764777262 2414254854 5403321571 8530614228 8137585043 0633217518 2979866223 7172159160 7716692547 4873898665 4949450114 6540628433 6639379003 9769265672 1463853067 3609657120 9180763832 7166416274 8888007869 2560290228 4721040317 2118608204 1900042296 6171196377 9213375751 1495950156 6049631862 9472654736 4252308177 0367515906 7350235072 8354056704 0386743513 6222247715 8915049530 9844489333 0963408780 7693259939 7805419341 4473774418 4263129860 8099888687 4132604721 5695162396 5864573021 6315981931 9516735381 2974167729 4786724229 2465436680 0980676928 2382806899 6400482435 4037014163 1496589794 0924323789 6907069779 4223625082 2168895738 3798623001 5937764716 5122893578 6015881617 5578297352 3344604281 5126272037 3431465319 7777416031 9906655418 7639792933 4419521541 3418994854 4473456738 3162499341 9131814809 2777710386 3877343177 2075456545 3220777092 1201905166 0962804909 2636019759 8828161332 3166636528 6193266863 3606273567 6303544776 2803504507 7723554710 5859548702 7908143562 4014517180 6246436267 9456127531 8134078330 3362542327 8394497538 2437205835 3114771199 2606381334 6776879695 9703098339 1307710987 0408591337 4641442822 7726346594 7047458784 7787201927 7152807317 6790770715 7213444730 6057007334 9243693113 8350493163 1284042512 1925651798 0694113528 0131470130 4781643788 5185290928 5452011658 3934196562 1349143415 9562586586 5570552690 4965209858 0338507224 2648293972 8584783163 0577775606 8887644624 8246857926 0395352773 4803048029 0058760758 2510474709 1643961362 6760449256 2742042083 2085661190 6254543372 1315359584 5068772460 2901618766 7952406163 4252257719 5429162991 9306455377 9914037340 4328752628 8896399587 9475729174 6426357455 2540790914 5135711136 9410911939 3251910760 2082520261 8798531887 7058429725 9167781314 9699009019 2116971737 2784768472 6860849003 3770242429 1651300500 5168323364 3503895170 2989392233 4517220138 1280696501 1784408745 1960121228 5993716231 3017114448 4640903890 6449544400 6198690754 8516026327 5052983491 8740786680 8818338510 2283345085 0486082503 9302133219 7155184306 3545500766 8282949304 1377655279 3975175461 3953984683 3936383047 4611996653 8581538420 5685338621 8672523340 2830871123 2827892125 0771262946 3229563989 8989358211 6745627010 2183564622 0134967151 8819097303 8119800497 3407239610 3685406643 1939509790 1906996395 5245300545 0580685501 9567302292 1913933918 5680344903 9820595510 0226353536 1920419947 4553859381 0234395544 9597783779 0237421617 2711172364 3435439478 2218185286 2408514006 6604433258 8856986705 4315470696 5747458550 3323233421 0730154594 0516553790 6866273337 9958511562 5784322988 2737231989 8757141595 7811196358 3300594087 3068121602 8764962867 4460477464 9159950549 7374256269 0104903778 1986835938 1465741268 0492564879 8556145372 3478673303 9046883834 3634655379 4986419270 5638729317 4872332083 7601123029 9113679386 2708943879 9362016295 1541337142 4892830722 0126901475 4668476535 7616477379 4675200490 7571555278 1965362132 3926406160 1363581559 0742202020 3187277605 2772190055 6148425551 8792530343 5139844253 2234157623 3610642506 3904975008 6562710953 5919465897 5141310348 2276930624 7435363256 9160781547 8181152843 6679570611 0861533150 4452127473 9245449454 2368288606 1340841486 3776700961 2071512491 4043027253 8607648236 3414334623 5189757664 5216413767 9690314950 1910857598 4423919862 9164219399 4907236234 6468441173 9403265918 4044378051 3338945257 4239950829 6591228508 5558215725 0310712570 1266830240 2929525220 1187267675 6220415420 5161841634 8475651699 9811614101 0029960783 8690929160 3028840026 9104140792 8862150784 2451670908 7000699282 1206604183 7180653556 7252532567 5328612910 4248776182 5829765157 9598470356 2226293486 0034158722 9805349896 5022629174 8788202734 2092222453 3985626476 6914905562 8425039127 5771028402 7998066365 8254889264 8802545661 0172967026 6407655904 2909945681 5065265305 3718294127 0336931378 5178609040 7086671149 6558343434 7693385781 7113864558 7367812301 4587687126 6034891390 9562009939 3610310291 6161528813 8437909904 2317473363 9480457593 1493140529 7634757481 1935670911 0137751721 0080315590 2485309066 9203767192 2033229094 3346768514 2214477379 3937517034 4366199104 0337511173 5471918550 4644902636 5512816228 8244625759</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/barrycenter-of-a-hollow-sphere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tides: More than the ocean waves</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/tides-more-than-the-ocean-waves/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/tides-more-than-the-ocean-waves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/tides-more-than-the-ocean-waves/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The moon revolves around the earth about once every 27 days.  This lunar cycle controls countless things, including the mentral cycle of countless animals, among other interesting things.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The average person upon hearing the term tides would imagine the ocean waves receding and advancing on the beach. They would be wrong. This is only an affect of the tides produced by the gravitational disturbances related to the moon and the sun. You might think that the sun, being our closest star, and holding a volume of about 24,000,000,000,000,000,000 cubic kilometers (24 quadrillion km3) of hydrogen, would create great tidal forces. This is true, but at our distance of 149,600,000 kilometers average (1 AU) its effects contribute to only 10% of earth&#8217;s tides. The moon, while only having a volume of 385,847,000,000 cubic kilometers (385 billion km3) of rock, actually attributes to the other 90% of the tidal forces felt on earth. This is because our moon is only 384,400 kilometers away. The locality of a much smaller body affects the earth far greater than such a large and distant body as the sun.</p>
<p>This leads to the question of how these tidal forces create the motion of the ocean. To picture this you have to understand the way the gravity on earth holds things together, and the resulting layers of matter. To start you have the inner and outer cores. These rotate within the earth at a speed approximately 550 miles per hour faster than the earth itself rotates. You then have the mantle, above that is the crust, above that is the oceans, and above that is the atmosphere (which has many layers itself). These, over billions of years, have been sorted through gravity and the rotation of the earth. The abundance of liquid water on earth added to the earth&#8217;s malleability, speeding up the process of separation.</p>
<p>The tides most easily affect the atmosphere. From our perspective on earth we cannot see this. The space shuttles and other non-earthly observatories have noted tremendous bulging of the earth&#8217;s gasses, creating an oblong near egg shape preceeding the moon&#8217;s revolutions along the equator. Water on earth&#8217;s surface affect is minor; to the point it will recede and advance only in terms of a several meters. The earth&#8217;s crust actually bulges as much as a 30 centimeters as well. The question remains, how does the gravity from our moon and sun play with earth&#8217;s surface?</p>
<p>The gravitational pull between earth and our moon actually creates a point of equilibrium, called a barrycenter. At this point no gravity is felt. I&#8217;ll explain this more in another post, but the earth is 12,756 kilometers in diameter, and our barrycenter is revolving at only 1,100 kilometers below the earth&#8217;s surface. This creates a literal vacuum at the point between the earth and the moon, and our atmosphere and oceans are the only matter which can significantly fill the void, which creates the bulge. Now there approximately two tides per day, so from where does the second bulge come? On the opposite side of the globe we have an area of slightly lower gravity, so the oceans fill that void as well.</p>
<p>If you remember I said that the ocean&#8217;s and atmosphere&#8217;s bulge preceeds the revolutions of the moon, rather than following it. This is caused by the rotation of the earth, pulling them slightly ahead of the moon&#8217;s pull. The matter in these bulges, as with any matter, has gravity of its own, and it pulls the moon as well, giving it more orbital energy, which in turn pushes the moon away from the earth at a rate of 2 centimeters per year. You might ask if the bulge can pull the moon, does the moon pull the bulge? As the bulge preceeds the moon due to rotation, and it is being pulled backwards, does this slow the rotation of the earth? Yep. We lose 0.002 seconds every day due to this.</p>
<p>The aforementioned effect of negative rotational acceleration due to the tides has caused the moon to have one side always face the earth. The same effect will one day have the earth&#8217;s most massive side always facing that side of the moon. Someone on the other side of the world may never see the moon! Billions of years ago the moon&#8217;s rotation was not locked with the earth, and was much closer. This would have been a sight, as the moon would take up a much larger portion of the sky, and you could see all sides! The earth&#8217;s days at this time would also be much shorter, in terms of 18 hours or so.</p>
<p>The moon revolves around the earth about once every 27 days. This lunar cycle controls countless things, including the menstrual cycle of countless animals, among other interesting things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/tides-more-than-the-ocean-waves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Center of the galaxy</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/center-of-the-galaxy/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/center-of-the-galaxy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2003 03:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/center-of-the-galaxy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The event horizon on this black hole has a diameter twice that of our solar system.  That is a volume of 127,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 cube kilometers!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many places in the universe which create immense gravitational forces. Individual stars are surprisingly on the lower end if measuring scale. Black holes are inescapably strong, but at a distance their pull is no stronger than an equally massive star. Globular clusters are regions in which star growth is, or was at one time, exceedingly rapid. Hydrogen nebulas coalesce and form hundreds and thousands of hot, blue young stars. Most globular clusters observed now consist of older red dwarves. Gathered at the center of these clusters are often white dwarves, neutron stars, and conceivably a small black hole. The concentration of massive objects allows the cluster to bend the fabric of the universe far more than your average areas of the galaxy.</p>
<p>By far the largest purveyors of gravitational forces in the universe are galaxies themselves. These monsters of mass can be in many different shapes. You rarely find a spherical galaxy as large as a spiral or elliptical galaxy. Spiral appears to be the most common, and has massive gravitational arms revolving around the center. These arms are fascinating; they are not made up of simply a specific bunch of stars and nebula. The arms are gravitational waves which concentrate matter as they come, and then spread it back out as they go by. A single star will go in and out of these arms constantly in its life; it gets tremendously closer, and again tremendously far away from its neighboring stars each wave. This phenomenon isn&#8217;t yet completely understood.</p>
<p>The center of a galaxy is probably the most fascinating. It appears that most large galaxies have a super-massive black hole powering the surrounding revolutions. These black holes have been measured at being sometimes billions of times more massive than our sun.  Some galaxies have been observed to have two super-massive black holes in their center! Sagittarius A, the black hole in the center of the Milky Way, is approximately 2 million times the mass of our sun. The event horizon on this black hole has a diameter twice that of our solar system. That is approximately 24,000,000,000 kilometers in diameter. That is a volume of 127,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 cubic kilometers (127 nonillion km3)! This is what makes the galaxy go-round. Also in the center are giant hydrogen clouds, enormous stars and things referred to as canes, threads, snakes, and arcs. This mass is enough to keep the inner galaxy revolving around it. The inner galaxy then adds its mass to keep the outer galaxy revolving.</p>
<p>Dark matter is likely one of the most abundant things to provide mass in the galaxy, but it is an unknown. My own hypothesis is it is simply hydrogen clouds not actively lit up by an active source of energy, so it does not emit any form of detectable energies itself. I will discuss many of the points in this article, of which I today just touched on, at another time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/center-of-the-galaxy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hydrogen to Helium fusion</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/hydrogen-to-helium-fusion/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/hydrogen-to-helium-fusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2003 12:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/hydrogen-to-helium-fusion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been asked to explain how 4 hydrogen become 1 helium atom through fusion.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been asked to explain how 4 hydrogen become 1 helium atom through fusion.  Why does it take so many?  This is a bit beyond my ability to put into layman&#8217;s terms, so I will link to a <a href="http://zebu.uoregon.edu/textbook/energygen.html">University of Oregon site</a> which explains this through a 3 step video.  I highly recommend everyone view this.  Learning about quantum processes truly does help you more understand everything around you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/hydrogen-to-helium-fusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Astronomy picture of the day</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/astronomy-picture-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/astronomy-picture-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2003 10:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/astronomy-picture-of-the-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to view new and amazing pictures of the cosmos?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to view new and amazing pictures of the cosmos?  Check it out at NASA&#8217;s <a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html">Astronomy Picture of the Day</a>.  The archive is available <a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html">here</a>.  I truly recommend this as a daily view, if not set as your homepage!  I use this for research.  I find one that piques my interest, and research it further through other means.</p>
<p>I just learned about Universities Space Research Association <a href="http://epod.usra.edu/">Earth Science Picture of the Day</a>.  I know nothing about it as of yet, but I plan to go through the entire archive in the next few days.  I&#8217;m excited!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/astronomy-picture-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How bad is your astronomy?</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/how-bad-is-your-astronomy/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/how-bad-is-your-astronomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2003 03:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/how-bad-is-your-astronomy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an excellent site reteaching you what you thought you knew, but actually didn't.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I encourage  you all to peruse <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/info/whois.html">Phil Plait</a>&#8217;s website <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/">Bad Astronomy</a>.  This is an excellent site reteaching you what you thought you knew, but actually didn&#8217;t.  He gives one a great baseline for learning more serious astronomy.  The site is a very interesting read, and he even has a <A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471409766/compootercom">book</A>, which is even better.  He explains everything from how the sun appears larger on the horizon, through eggs standing on their end in the equinox, to dissecting Hollywood</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/how-bad-is-your-astronomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Formation of quark stars</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/formation-of-quark-stars/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/formation-of-quark-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2003 04:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/formation-of-quark-stars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The core undergoes gravitational collapse and rises to over 100,000,000,000 degrees.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quark stars are what got me to pursue Astronomy as a hobby.  Imagine a star so dense it cannot contain itself, explodes and is now so dense it cannot remain a neutron star.  Normally this would form an event horizon and become a singularity.  But there is a point of equilibrium between these two states.  A star just less than 15 times the mass of our sun has a small chance of shattering the strong forces holding its own matter together, and collapsing into a ball of strange quarks the size of Manhattan.  This phenomenon would have a gravitational pull just shy of a black hole, while being more massive, and smaller than a neutron star.</p>
<p>To start the discussion of quark stars I must first explain, in layman&#8217;s terms, the process of fusion igniting a star.  Most planets are not much more than a collection of hydrogen (H2), the most common element in the universe.  Saturn and Jupiter likely began as a relatively small rock, which gravitationally collected immense amounts of hydrogen to form a giant sphere.  The deeper into these planets the more dense is the hydrogen.</p>
<p>Moving along to the next phase of gas giants come to the brown dwarf.  These are not terribly larger than Jupiter, but can be multiple magnitudes more dense.  This greatly increases the gravitational forces on the body, which compresses its core to the point of deuterium (2H2) fusion.</p>
<p>Due to its own gravity a more massive body can begin to press its core so greatly that four hydrogen nuclei fuse to become one helium (He) nucleus.  This conversion leaves excess energy, which is expelled during the process.  In a star the size of the sun, 2,000,000,000 kilograms of mass becomes energy through fusion every second.</p>
<p>When the mass becomes five times greater than our sun explosions can occur.  Fusion process ends, and the mass of the core becomes denser, to the point of becoming completely iron.  The outside expands greatly into a supergiant.  The core undergoes gravitational collapse and rises to over 100,000,000,000 degrees.  The gravity only briefly overcomes the repulsive force of the nuclei and creates a shockwave, blowing off the outer layers of the star.  The outer layers smash together fusing into new elements and isotopes.  The outer matter continues into space as a nebula.  The core remaining is a super massive, but very small ball of neutrons.  This neutron star is usually spinning at a very high speed, and has a tremendous amount of electrons, creating a strong magnetic field.  This interacting with the expanding remnant creates gamma and x-rays.</p>
<p>What if the star was 15 times our sun or greater?  Well the neutrons do not survive the collapse.  They break down into an unknown form of matter and forms an event horizon outside of itself.  The matter is now a super-massive singularity, a black hole.</p>
<p>As I mentioned up top, quark stars are at an odd state between a black hole and a much larger neutron star.  A neutron is a bond between a proton and an electron, which is in a neutral state.  3 quarks make up a proton.  When the gravitational collapse occurs, electrons are expelled and trapped as the matter undergoes this transformation to a smaller state.  As this transformation ends the quarks can be found in a crystalline structure.  It has now reached equilibrium between shattering into a quantum singularity and being a relatively simple ball of neutron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/formation-of-quark-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introduction Artema</title>
		<link>http://universe1.org/2003/introduction-artema/</link>
		<comments>http://universe1.org/2003/introduction-artema/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2003 00:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garza</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Rem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://universe1.org/introduction-artema/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Artema was chosen possibly as early as the late 80s as my online name.  It is the Japanese way of speaking "Ultima".
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my pleasure to open my blog to the public.  My name is Michael Garza.  I was born in Baton Rouge Louisiana in 1979, and raised in Montevallo Alabama.  I have lived most of my adult life in Houston Texas.  I serve in the US Air Force, and am a 1C6.  I take in as much Astronomy and Cosmology as I can get.  If you like, you may address me as Artema.  This name was chosen in the 80s as my online name.  It is the Japanese way of speaking &#8220;Ultima&#8221;.</p>
<p>I will be speaking on all ranges of topics.  I mainly plan to discuss Astronomy and Cosmology, but I have little doubt I will stray into new technologies, a little politics, my family, and my friends.  Expect an entry tonight on quark stars.  Their formation is a truly fascinating phenomenon which originally got me interested in astronomy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://universe1.org/2003/introduction-artema/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
